Code of Practice and Editorial Standards

ScientologyBusiness.com adheres to the following principles of responsible journalism, informed by widely recognised industry standards including those of the Independent Press Standards Organisation and the National Union of Journalists.

1. Editorial Independence

ScientologyBusiness.com is committed to independent journalism. Editorial decisions are made without influence from political, religious, or commercial interests. We do not accept payment, gifts, or incentives in exchange for coverage.

2. Accuracy and Evidence

We take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading, or distorted information.

  • All material is checked prior to publication.
  • Significant inaccuracies will be corrected promptly and with due prominence.
  • Claims are supported by documents, firsthand accounts, or verifiable records.
  • Where uncertainty exists, it is clearly stated.
  • We distinguish clearly between fact, analysis, and opinion.

3. Fairness and Right of Reply

We are committed to fairness in reporting and, where appropriate, offer subjects the opportunity to respond to allegations or criticism prior to publication.

However, in cases where:

  • A subject or organisation has a documented history of refusing engagement, or
  • Repeated attempts to seek comment have been declined or ignored,

we may rely on previously published statements, public records, or documented positions instead of seeking comment for every individual article. Any standing position or known response from the subject will be represented accurately and in good faith.

4. Privacy

We respect the privacy of individuals and will avoid intrusion unless justified by a clear public interest.

5. Transparency

We are transparent about our methods and perspective.

  • Where relevant, we disclose potential conflicts of interest, including the editor’s background as a former member of Scientology.
  • We do not misrepresent our identity or use deceptive practices to obtain information, except where there is a clear and overriding public interest.

6. Corrections and Accountability

We take responsibility for our work.

  • Errors will be corrected promptly and clearly.
  • Significant corrections will be noted on the original article.
  • Readers may contact us to request corrections or raise concerns.

7. Protection of Sources

We respect the confidentiality of sources when requested and take reasonable steps to protect whistleblowers and individuals who may face harm for speaking out.

8. Avoidance of Harm

We aim to report in a way that minimizes unnecessary harm.

  • We avoid publishing unverified allegations.
  • We do not knowingly publish false or misleading information.
  • We balance the public interest with the potential impact on individuals.

9. Public Interest Focus

Our reporting is guided by the public interest, particularly in matters relating to business practices, accountability, and transparency.

10. No Harassment Policy

We do not engage in harassment. Where an organisation has explicitly declined communication or refuses engagement, we do not repeatedly contact them in a manner that could reasonably be construed as harassment. Instead, we rely on existing public statements and documented positions.

11. Complaints

We take complaints extremely seriously. If you have any concerns about our reporting, please contact us with the details of your complaint.